The institution considers it essential that the regulation takes into account the specific characteristics of Orihuela, both due to the situation of the historic center and the territorial dispersion between the urban core, its districts, and the coast. The president of Cámara Orihuela, Mario Martínez, has argued that this analysis is mandatory under the Market Unity Guarantee Law.
As explained by Martínez, Orihuela has "a historic center with traditional commerce that requires urgent measures to halt its decline," in addition to a large territory with significant distances and insufficient public transport. In the Chamber's view, this situation leads to a high dependence on private vehicles.
The Chamber also warns that the future Low Emission Zone must specifically assess its effect on logistics and delivery activities, which it considers essential for the functioning of local commerce.
Among its proposals, the Chamber suggests that the project include transitional periods and exemption schemes for activities that rely on motor vehicle use. These include goods delivery, retail trade, care activities, and maintenance vehicles.
The institution proposes strengthening mobility alternatives before applying restrictions. Specifically, it suggests improving the connection between the urban center, districts, and the coast through public transport, building park-and-ride facilities, expanding the electric charging network, and providing incentives for fleet renewal.
The Chamber of Commerce has requested a detailed study of the perimeter of the Low Emission Zone, especially if it affects the historic center, identified as a main area in the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan.
Martínez has warned that "the implementation of restrictions can worsen the loss of economic activity, hinder access for customers and suppliers, and negatively affect the competitiveness of the urban center if it is not adequately equipped with infrastructure and regulatory measures."
The entity further demands that the rules for the future LEZ be harmonized from the outset with state and regional regulations. It argues that establishing different criteria among municipalities can generate legal uncertainty and additional costs for businesses and citizens.
